Comments on: Squeeze Squash! http://www.sebruiz.net/281 Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:38:19 +0000 hourly 1 By: Squash 0.3 at sebruiz.net http://www.sebruiz.net/281/comment-page-1#comment-15861 Squash 0.3 at sebruiz.net Mon, 12 Nov 2007 01:44:49 +0000 http://www.sebruiz.net/281#comment-15861 [...] made a few improvements to Squash (formerly known as squeeze). Hopefully it has become a more reliable batch image resizer [...] [...] made a few improvements to Squash (formerly known as squeeze). Hopefully it has become a more reliable batch image resizer [...]

]]> By: manosv http://www.sebruiz.net/281/comment-page-1#comment-14811 manosv Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:41:17 +0000 http://www.sebruiz.net/281#comment-14811 Why not a build for Linux? it should be very easy Why not a build for Linux? it should be very easy

]]> By: patent building spokesman http://www.sebruiz.net/281/comment-page-1#comment-14366 patent building spokesman Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:52:54 +0000 http://www.sebruiz.net/281#comment-14366 not much to do with your app but there is an open source app called Squeeze ( an archiver that xfce uses by default i think ) . not much to do with your app but there is an open source app called Squeeze ( an archiver that xfce uses by default i think ) .

]]> By: Chani http://www.sebruiz.net/281/comment-page-1#comment-14365 Chani Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:08:50 +0000 http://www.sebruiz.net/281#comment-14365 add the ability to rotate individual images (like this maybe: http://agateau.wordpress.com/2007/10/13/rotation-20/ ), and this could save my mum a lot of time. :) add the ability to rotate individual images (like this maybe: http://agateau.wordpress.com/2007/10/13/rotation-20/ ), and this could save my mum a lot of time. :)

]]> By: XBO http://www.sebruiz.net/281/comment-page-1#comment-14359 XBO Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:00:05 +0000 http://www.sebruiz.net/281#comment-14359 Great program! Thanks! Any kubuntu package coming along? Great program! Thanks!

Any kubuntu package coming along?

]]> By: timahawk http://www.sebruiz.net/281/comment-page-1#comment-14353 timahawk Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:13:39 +0000 http://www.sebruiz.net/281#comment-14353 Wonderfull! This is just the thing my family could use for our family website! Thanks a bunch! timahawk p.s. Just another sentance with an exclamation point at the end! Wonderfull!

This is just the thing my family could use for our family website!

Thanks a bunch!

timahawk

p.s. Just another sentance with an exclamation point at the end!

]]> By: Louis http://www.sebruiz.net/281/comment-page-1#comment-14350 Louis Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:19:04 +0000 http://www.sebruiz.net/281#comment-14350 Also, how awesome is it that Seb asks for volunteers to make the Mac and Win binaries, and he gets them within 5 posts?! Also, how awesome is it that Seb asks for volunteers to make the Mac and Win binaries, and he gets them within 5 posts?!

]]> By: Louis http://www.sebruiz.net/281/comment-page-1#comment-14349 Louis Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:13:36 +0000 http://www.sebruiz.net/281#comment-14349 This program looks very handy, Seb. A jpeg compression/quality slider would be great, but not totally necessary. Regarding seam carving, that seems a bit out of scope for this simple utility. Based on what I've read on BKO, it _might_ be coming soon to Digikam, though. This program looks very handy, Seb. A jpeg compression/quality slider would be great, but not totally necessary. Regarding seam carving, that seems a bit out of scope for this simple utility. Based on what I’ve read on BKO, it _might_ be coming soon to Digikam, though.

]]> By: logixoul http://www.sebruiz.net/281/comment-page-1#comment-14345 logixoul Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:50:32 +0000 http://www.sebruiz.net/281#comment-14345 anon: heh, you just described the whole point of using seam carving =) anon: heh, you just described the whole point of using seam carving =)

]]> By: anonymous http://www.sebruiz.net/281/comment-page-1#comment-14341 anonymous Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:58:36 +0000 http://www.sebruiz.net/281#comment-14341 One problem I see with the seam-carving algorithm is that it doesn't actually resize areas of importance (i.e., high energy content) in the image. As a result, scales get a bit wacky in the resized image. For example, shrink the image by half, but the people and buildings remain the same size. The result is that everything moves closer together. One problem I see with the seam-carving algorithm is that it doesn’t actually resize areas of importance (i.e., high energy content) in the image. As a result, scales get a bit wacky in the resized image. For example, shrink the image by half, but the people and buildings remain the same size. The result is that everything moves closer together.

]]>