<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Websites which can&#8217;t handle TCP window scaling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sebruiz.net/255/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sebruiz.net/255</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:15:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seb</title>
		<link>http://www.sebruiz.net/255/comment-page-1#comment-6369</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebruiz.net/255#comment-6369</guid>
		<description>Thanks you all so much, you have solved my seemingly unfixable problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks you all so much, you have solved my seemingly unfixable problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LukyLuke</title>
		<link>http://www.sebruiz.net/255/comment-page-1#comment-6368</link>
		<dc:creator>LukyLuke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebruiz.net/255#comment-6368</guid>
		<description>Based on the information/solution from Jonathan I found an other, in my point of view a much better, solution.
Instead to scale down the whole net to a 64 KByte buffer for sending and receiving, you can add custom routes for hosts/nets where this occurres:
  ip route add IP.ADD.RE.SS/32 via YourDefaultGateway window 65535

For your given site for example something like this:
  ip route add 149.171.95.20 via YourDefaultGateway window 65535
  (Just replace &quot;YourDefaultGateway&quot; with it)

NB: I found this solution (in german) on http://de.opensuse.org/SDB:Problem_mit_der_Herstellung_einer_TCP/IP_Verbindung_in_openSUSE_10.2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on the information/solution from Jonathan I found an other, in my point of view a much better, solution.<br />
Instead to scale down the whole net to a 64 KByte buffer for sending and receiving, you can add custom routes for hosts/nets where this occurres:<br />
  ip route add IP.ADD.RE.SS/32 via YourDefaultGateway window 65535</p>
<p>For your given site for example something like this:<br />
  ip route add 149.171.95.20 via YourDefaultGateway window 65535<br />
  (Just replace &#8220;YourDefaultGateway&#8221; with it)</p>
<p>NB: I found this solution (in german) on <a href="http://de.opensuse.org/SDB:Problem_mit_der_Herstellung_einer_TCP/IP_Verbindung_in_openSUSE_10.2" rel="nofollow">http://de.opensuse.org/SDB:Problem_mit_der_Herstellung_einer_TCP/IP_Verbindung_in_openSUSE_10.2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.sebruiz.net/255/comment-page-1#comment-6367</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebruiz.net/255#comment-6367</guid>
		<description>Hi. That website wouldn&#039;t load here either. Wireshark showed that I could connect and send the http request alright, but the server didn&#039;t respond to that.

Jonathan&#039;s solution made it work for me. Weird kind of problem...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. That website wouldn&#8217;t load here either. Wireshark showed that I could connect and send the http request alright, but the server didn&#8217;t respond to that.</p>
<p>Jonathan&#8217;s solution made it work for me. Weird kind of problem&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Eggleton</title>
		<link>http://www.sebruiz.net/255/comment-page-1#comment-6366</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Eggleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebruiz.net/255#comment-6366</guid>
		<description>FWIW, I get the same issue here with Konq 3.5.7 on Gentoo here in NZ. Jonothan Brugge&#039;s remedy above seems to fix it though, so hopefully it will for you as well :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, I get the same issue here with Konq 3.5.7 on Gentoo here in NZ. Jonothan Brugge&#8217;s remedy above seems to fix it though, so hopefully it will for you as well <img src='http://www.sebruiz.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkstar</title>
		<link>http://www.sebruiz.net/255/comment-page-1#comment-6365</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebruiz.net/255#comment-6365</guid>
		<description>Check the MTU of your network card(s). I had similar problems with PCs behind a router. Try setting the MTU down to 1450 for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check the MTU of your network card(s). I had similar problems with PCs behind a router. Try setting the MTU down to 1450 for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Brugge</title>
		<link>http://www.sebruiz.net/255/comment-page-1#comment-6360</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Brugge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebruiz.net/255#comment-6360</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen a similar problem which took me quite some time to solve. In that case, there was a faulty router somewhere between me and the website. It didn&#039;t work well with TCP scaling and combined with some specific kernel versions which made the situation worse, lead to the problem you describe. Does &#039;echo 0 &gt; /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling&#039; solve it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen a similar problem which took me quite some time to solve. In that case, there was a faulty router somewhere between me and the website. It didn&#8217;t work well with TCP scaling and combined with some specific kernel versions which made the situation worse, lead to the problem you describe. Does &#8216;echo 0 &gt; /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling&#8217; solve it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon Ymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sebruiz.net/255/comment-page-1#comment-6359</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon Ymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebruiz.net/255#comment-6359</guid>
		<description>Maybe a bit obvious, but have you tried tcpdump?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a bit obvious, but have you tried tcpdump?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random</title>
		<link>http://www.sebruiz.net/255/comment-page-1#comment-6357</link>
		<dc:creator>Random</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebruiz.net/255#comment-6357</guid>
		<description>Java -- check your java settings .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Java &#8212; check your java settings .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
