Forward: This is a repost of the article which I wrote for a recent commit digest report by Danny Allen. Since February, Amarok 2.1 has continued improvement, so don’t take the following content as “exhaustive”.
Amarok 2 marked the first release of the newest generation of Amarok. This marked over two years of very hard work by our entire development team was greeted with great relief by all contributors to the project for a number of important reasons. As developers, we were keen to get our software out the door to users on a larger scale than simply beta quality software. We craved the feedback from the masses to improve Amarok and to get out the feature freeze that seemed to never end. More than that, all developers had great plans for implementing new features and reviving loved functionality that was temporarily removed during the overhaul.
One of the most challenging parts of the transition to Amarok 2 was refactoring the innards of the application to make it more scalable, robust and flexible for future improvements. In many ways, this was one of the biggest technical problems of the 1.4 series — it did not scale well to new features.
Following the release of Amarok 2.0, we received mixed reviews from critics and users alike. Many writers praised the user interface overhaul and infrastructure changes, such as Ryan Paul in his article over at Ars Technica:
“After extensive testing, I’m convinced that Amarok 2 is a major improvement.”
Jeremy LaCroix of linux.com reported a fair review and noted many aspects of Amarok 2.0 that left much improvement to be desired. As a team, we’ve concentrated on many of the concerns that have been raised in reviews and in forum posts by evaluating importance and relative cost of implementation. Examples of requests which we have brought back for the 2.1 release of Amarok include: track queueing, replay gain support, playlist searching and playlist layouts.
We were well aware that with the release of Amarok 2.0, it would be impossible to match the feature set precedent that had been set so high by us in previous releases. To put it simply, we felt that Amarok as a project would have been detrimentally affected by indefinitely waiting to reach feature parity with the 1.4 releases. We were forced to take a stand and simply tell ourselves to wait to implement them. Trying to incorporate the features that are the most useful and important is a difficult task when there are often twelve different responses between five people in a discussion — one man’s garbage is another man’s treasure. That said, we did elect to remove some features from Amarok entirely – mainly for technical reasons (multiple database support for example), some for lack of developer resources (moodbar), and also some for usability reasons (such as tabular playlist design – remember, we’re the experts!).
Initially, the responses to the announcements of dropping features was exactly what we expected — there would be outcry. We expected this for a number of reasons: only the disgruntled speak up, and most readers wouldn’t initially understand how they could adapt to new paradigms. We dealt with this by trying the best we could to deal with the fallout by responding to each individual complaint or worry, but obviously we couldn’t get to all of them (and some were not worth wasting time on). I feel that we’ve managed the community quite well, and that the community has been good to us too by mostly understanding our position and being patient with the developments. Honest communication through blogs of missing features that would return was appreciated by users, and we’ve done our best to bring back the most requested for 2.1.
Many users have decided to stick with Amarok 1.4 for the time being until they see a better set of features implemented. And quite frankly, that’s okay with us. On the otherside, there are users who are keen to try out newer development features but are uncomfortable messing with their system compiling unstable development versions. Neon, our nightly build package service has been praised and exceptionally useful to give users cutting edge builds with no hassle.
Finally, it seems to us that most of our users have noticed the rough edges of the graphics which are being used in the application (specifically the context view). We realise that this does need some work and are trying hard to work with artists develop some great visuals. Also we’ve tried to improve the usability and performance of the context view by providing only a single containment rather than four, and better widgets to use.
If you’re interested in seeing a tour of some of the new (and revisited) features which are coming to Amarok 2.1, take a look at this great overview.
